Wednesday, April 2, 2008

Why Choose A Core 2 Duo For Your CPU In Your New High End Computer ?

It must be difficult for Intel to observe & 39; AMD Athlon 64, and then the Athlon 64 X2 and FX pretty much on the performance of the PC market, with the once untouchable chip giant in a position where his only reaction was competitive reduce prices. Those were dark days indeed. But now, with the release of the long-awaited code-named Conroe " " - the Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Extreme processors - Intel looks at the beginning of a new era of desktop domination.

Most Intel expects viewers back to the performance crown from AMD, but few expected, the sheer size of this victory, or the almost flawless style, with the Intel. And the Core 2 Duo is only the first strike in this fight, as well as Intel Pentium D planning preemptive price drops and its single-core Pentium 4 and Celeron D lines as well.

The Conroe characterized in three areas, which has become the very definition of what a current buyer expects a top-end desktop CPU. These factors include the price, performance and energy, and the 65-nanometer process and Duo Core 2 Extreme have surpassed their AMD counterparts in the individual, the completion of the same type of Triple Play, that AMD had on the Pentium 4 and Pentium D.

The question of who has the best performance is not up for debate: the 2.93GHz Core 2 Extreme X6800 is the fastest desktop processor on the planet, and the 2.66GHz Core 2 Duo E6700 is not far behind. Also, the next step-down 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo E6600 is an excellent desktop performer, AMD & 39; s flagship Athlon 64 FX-62 in most tests.

Power and cooling are also extremely low - the duo Core 2 offers the lowest power draw any dual-core processor, the Core Duo 2 Extreme not far away. The prices are also very competitive. In fact, it is surprising that for such a competitive price, the Core 2 Duo E6600 AMD may exceed the entire desktop lineup. The lower end Core 2 Duo E6300 and E6400 models are still affordable, although their 4MB instead of 2MB Level 2 cache of mean their relative performance is not as high.

Intel has about a drastic departure from the Pentium NetBurst technology. Conroe for the next generation of nuclear exports more instructions per clock (IPC), rather than a longer and possibly less efficient pipeline may bar in the stratosphere. Core 2 processors & 39; 2MB or 4MB of 256-bit L2 cache feature, which Intel calls Advanced Smart Cache, the dynamic between the two cores for maximum efficiency rather than chaining half of the cache for each core.

With IPC levels greater than that of AMD and speeds of up to 2.93GHz and 1066MHz front-side bus Intel will also continue in the future, the power play despite sticking with the traditional CPU and chipset architecture instead of AMD on-chip memory Controller approach.

The Conroe design also reflects a need to ensure that power and heat production down on various energy efficient technologies. Because the basic architecture is shared by all Intel-processor lines (with the exception of the Itanium), including future mobile CPUs, this in a very efficient power processing.

The Duo and Core 2 Extreme processors provide industry-leading performance, but Intel& 39;s SpeedStep technology ensures that the chips can ramp down and clock frequency multiplier reduced to conserve battery power and / or heat and lower core.

Moreover new Intelligent Power Capability can go beyond slowing the CPU as a whole to turn various core functions and off. This energy-saving technology is not in the manner of the final performance, as the Conroe immediately jumps back to top speed when required.

Through the use of the technical expertise provided by the advanced CPU server technology and Intel exprertise has leapfrogged again on a combination of performance, low power consumption and heat generation and reliability above all, as with advances in CPU speed can be disabling and harmful hear.

The Core 2 Duo CPUs should have a big role in your next high-end computers to buy. yawney dania



Bookmark it: del.icio.usdigg.comreddit.comnetvouz.comgoogle.comyahoo.comtechnorati.comfurl.netbloglines.comsocialdust.comma.gnolia.comnewsvine.comslashdot.orgsimpy.com

No comments: